Close

Kidney Disease Pediatric Malpractice Lawsuit

Perez v. Rhodes

This pediatric malpractice claim was filed in Prince George's County when a pediatrician treated a baby's reoccurring UTIs with ineffective antibiotics. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on January 29, 2018, and it is the 52nd medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A baby girl was healthy and her pediatric check-ups were uneventful until she presented to her pediatrician with vomiting, diarrhea, and a low-grade fever at eight months old. The baby was diagnosed with gastroenteritis and prescribed Tylenol with codeine. The pediatrician never suspected an infection, and a urinalysis was not performed.

At ten months old, the baby presented to her pediatrician again with a three-day fever and vomiting. Her mother said that she appeared to be urinating more than usual. A urinalysis revealed that the baby was suffering from a urinary tract infection (UTI) with a large amount of blood, white blood cells, and 3+ protein in her urine. A urine culture showed that the bacteria causing the infection was E. coli, which is resistant to Bactrim and sensitive to other antibiotics, including Augmentin. Disregarding the urine culture, the pediatrician placed the baby on Augmentin.

The baby had another UTI when she was one year old, which her pediatrician again treated with Augmentin. The pediatrician ordered a renal sonogram and a voiding cyst urethrogram because, having suffered from at least two UTIs in her first year of life, the baby was at risk for kidney disease. The diagnostic tests indicated bilateral Grade IV vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) - a condition which can progress to permanent kidney damage if left untreated. In this circumstance, the accepted standard of care dictates that the pediatrician should have prescribed an appropriate prophylactic antibiotic and recommended surgical intervention. Instead, the pediatrician prescribed Bactrim to treat a Bactrim-resistant UTI.

Over the next two years, the baby saw her pediatrician seven more times with at least four more UTIs. The pediatrician continued to treat the baby with Bactrim and Augmentin, even though the UTIs were Bactrim-resistant and Augmentin-sensitive.

Finally, just before her third birthday, the baby was sent to a urologist at Children's National Medical Center. The urologist diagnosed the baby with Stage II chronic kidney disease, which occurred as a result of her recurrent UTIs and VUR. More likely than not, the baby's Stage II kidney disease will eventually progress to end-stage renal disease.

Additional Comments
  • The standard of care for pediatric UTIs dictates that after one to two weeks of antimicrobial treatment, children should be closely monitored to make sure that the infection does not reoccur. Kidney and bladder ultrasounds should also be performed to check for abnormalities. Close clinical follow-up is extremely important because reoccurring or untreated pediatric UTIs can cause long-term health problems such as renal scarring, hypertension, and end-stage renal disease.
  • Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) occurs when urine flows abnormally from the bladder back up the ureters (tubes) toward the kidneys. It increases the risk of UTIs, which can lead to kidney damage if left untreated. Some people are born with VUR because they have a defect in the valve that would normally prevent backward urine flow, and some people acquire VUR after they have a urinary tract malfunction.
Jurisdiction
  • Prince George's County
Defendants
  • A pediatrician and his practice
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • Children's National Medical Center
Negligence
  • Failing to place the baby on appropriate prophylactic antibiotic therapy.
  • Failing to perform the appropriate tests to check for kidney disease.
  • Failing to perform timely urinalyses and urine cultures.
  • Failing to take the urine culture results into account when prescribing antibiotics.
  • Failing to properly communicate with the baby's consulting nephrologist.
  • Failing to refer the baby to a urologist, nephrologist, and surgeon in a timely manner.
Specific Counts Pled
  • As a direct result of the defendants' negligence, the baby suffered painful and permanent injuries, including kidney disease. She and her family also incurred past hospital and medical expenses, future medical expenses, and other financial losses.
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty
  • Michael McKenzie, M.D., Pediatrics
Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you suffered a hospital injury due to the negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you. Call us at (800) 553-8082 and speak to one of our medical malpractice attorneys who can help you or get an online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Medical Malpractice
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA
Contact Us For a Free Consultation

I understand that submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. I also understand that Miller & Zois works with multiple law firms on these claims and that I may be contacted by an affiliated law firm working with Miller & Zois on these lawsuits.