Close

Leg Amputation from Delayed DVT Diagnosis

Tillery v. Emergency Medicine Associates

This medical malpractice claim was filed in Prince George's County after a man's leg was amputated due to a delayed deep vein thrombosis diagnosis. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on January 23, 2018, and it is the 40th medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A man with a history of obesity, high blood pressure, and a right leg deep venous thrombosis (DVT, a blood clot) presented to the Emergency Department at Doctors Community Hospital complaining of constant left calf and foot pain beginning suddenly that morning. A venous ultrasound was negative for DVT and he was discharged a few hours later with instructions to follow up with his primary care doctor.

Two weeks later, the man returned to the emergency department with escalating symptoms. He had intermittent left foot and ankle pain that got worse with walking, a "cold" feeling, and a sore between his toes.

After an additional week went by, the man arrived at Prince George's Hospital via ambulance with severe pain, cold, and numbness in his left leg with no palpable pulse. A CT scan showed a large blood clot almost completely blocking blood flow to the arteries in his lower left leg. A vascular surgeon started him on medication in an effort to dissolve the clot. Over the next several days the man underwent two unsuccessful procedures, a thrombectomy and a femoral popliteal bypass surgery, before he was transferred to Washington Hospital Center for a stent angioplasty.

The angioplasty was unsuccessful and the man ultimately required an above-knee amputation.

Additional Comments
  • "Thrombus" is the medical term for a blood clot, so deep vein thrombosis occurs when a blood clot forms in a deep vein, usually a vein in the leg. The blood clot can block blood flow to the leg, or it can break off and travel to the lungs, causing a pulmonary embolism. Either way, DVT is a serious life- and limb-threatening condition. The claimant in this case had a classical presentation of DVT: pain in his calf that might have felt like cramping or soreness. He also had several alarming risk factors, including obesity and a history of DVT. All things considered, the emergency department staff should have performed more diagnostic tests to thoroughly rule out DVT before releasing the man from the hospital.
  • When the claimant first arrived at the Doctors Community Hospital Emergency Department his symptoms were relatively mild, implying that he was experiencing the early stages of DVT and his left leg was still benefiting from some blood flow. If the DVT had been diagnosed at that point, it is highly likely that he would've made a full recovery. When an extremity is cool to the touch, like the claimant's leg upon his return to the hospital, it is an indication of severely restricted blood flow. The plaintiff's statement of claim doesn't include much information about the second Doctors Hospital visit, but it's difficult to rationalize discharging a patient with such obvious symptoms of a blood clot.
Jurisdiction
  • Prince George's County
Defendants
  • An ER doctor
  • Emergency Medicine Associates, P.A. d/b/a Emergency Medicine Associates, P.A., P.C.
  • Doctors' Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Doctors Community Hospital
  • A physician's assistant
  • Two registered nurses
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • Doctors Community Hospital
  • Prince George's Hospital
  • Washington Hospital Center
Negligence
  • Failing to appropriately examine the claimant for a blocked artery.
  • Failing to perform a vascular exam or any diagnostic testing on the claimant's first visit to Doctors Community Hospital.
  • Failing to consult a vascular surgeon.
Specific Counts Pled
  • As a direct result of the defendant health care providers' negligence, the claimant suffered additional medical procedures, economic loss, and permanent injury that resulted in the loss of his left leg.
Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you suffered a hospital injury due to the negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you. Call us at (800) 553-8082 and speak to one of our medical malpractice attorneys who can help you or get an online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Medical Malpractice
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA
Contact Us For a Free Consultation

I understand that submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. I also understand that Miller & Zois works with multiple law firms on these claims and that I may be contacted by an affiliated law firm working with Miller & Zois on these lawsuits.