Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Lingual Nerve Damage Lawsuit in Prince George's County

Our law firm summarizes medical malpractice cases that are filed in Maryland. The most common malpractice lawsuit might be lingual nerve injury claims filed against dentists. They are wildly common. The case we look at below is another dental malpractice nerve injury case involving the lingual nerve.

Does our law firm handle these cases? We do not. But we do refer these cases to a dental malpractice lawyer who regularly brings these cases.

Baker v. National Harbor Dental Associates, DDS, P.A.

dental malpractice lawyerThis is a dental malpractice suit brought by a Prince George's County woman. The defendants are a dental practice and an oral surgeon.

Lingual nerve injuries during tooth extraction are common nor are malpractice lawsuits involving lingual nerve injuries. This is the 17th malpractice lawsuit filed in Maryland 2018 but not the first lingual nerve injury case. Usually, these injuries are temporary and resolve with time. In this scenario, an avoidable lingual nerve injury occurred that is seemingly permanent. In this case, it is alleged that injury was not detected until later despite the patient's complaints and she developed additional health complications.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

The plaintiff is undergoing a dental examination performed by the defendants. She is told that her lower third molars (or wisdom teeth) should be removed. During extraction, the plaintiff's inferior alveolar nerve is traumatized. This nerve controls sensation in the lower teeth. The plaintiff then develops numbness to the left side of her lips, chin, and gums.

When the plaintiff complains about this numbness several days later, the defendants tell her that it's a temporary side effect. In June, the plaintiff returns with an infection at the site of the tooth extraction. The infection is drained and the plaintiff is given antibiotics by the defendant. The infection persists and the plaintiff is hospitalized roughly one week alter.

The plaintiff is diagnosed with increased swelling and a lesion to the left side of her face. These conditions are treated with an antibiotic IV. The plaintiff is later diagnosed with cellulitis and a facial abscess. She's also found to have continued anesthesia to the left side of the mouth and gums. She seeks a second opinion about her condition from a dentist. The dentist determines she has a permanent fistula and osteomyelitis of the left posterior mandible. A fistula is an infected tunnel that develops in organs like blood vessels while Osteomyelitis is a bone infection. He also determines she has a permanent lingual nerve injury from the earlier tooth extraction.

Case Analysis
  • Wisdom teeth removal is a routine dental procedure. Wisdom teeth are either the second or final pair of adult teeth an individual develops, usually during the late teenage years or early adulthood. However, surgery to remove these teeth places both the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves at risk of injury.
  • The suit alleges negligence before, during and after surgery. Not only did the defendants fail to take steps to prevent the nerve injury, they injured the nerve and dismissed the patient's complaints of numbness. Careful monitoring of a patient's sensory recovery is critical after oral surgery.
  • Diagnosing osteomyelitis is difficult. Doctors rely on a combination of intuition and patient symptoms like a high white blood cell count and fever. Usually, suspected osteomyelitis is confirmed with radiological imaging tests. The plaintiff is alleging that these kind of tests should have been performed when she exhibited ongoing facial numbness.
Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses

The plaintiff's certifying expert is Armond Kotikian, DDS. Dr. Kotikian is board certified in general surgery as well as oral and maxillofacial surgery. His report confirms that the defendants traumatized the plaintiff's nerve and failed to take corrective action as dictated by the standard of care. Dr. Kotikian also alleges the defendants did not take appropriate precautions before performing the surgery. He concludes that the plaintiff's nerve injury is permanent. He expressed that she will have painful numbness to the left side of her face which interferes with her ability to eat or perform other functions.

Alleged Negligence
  • The defendants failed to take precautions against injuring the plaintiff's inferior alveolar nerve during a wisdom tooth extraction procedure.
  • The defendants unknowingly traumatized the nerve during the tooth removal.
  • The defendants also failed to properly investigate the plaintiff's complaints after they became aware of the nerve injury.
  • The defendants failed to prescribe steroids after discovering the nerve injury or refer the plaintiff to a nerve repair specialist. They also failed to properly address oral infections that arose at the injury site.


A dentist and National Harbor Dental Associates, DDS, P.A.


Prince George's County

Similar Cases See Also Getting a Lawyer for Your Medical Malpractice Claim

Has a dentist's negligence caused a serious injury? You are entitled to justice and compensation for the harm done to you or a loved one. Miller & Zois is here to help you. We have a long history of obtaining large settlements and verdicts in medical malpractice cases in Maryland. Get a free online case review or call us today at (800) 553-8082.

Client Reviews
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA