Close

Montgomery County ENT Malpractice Lawsuit

Palombi v. Metropolitan ENT & Facial Plastic Surgery

This surgical malpractice claim was filed in Montgomery County when a doctor allegedly improperly placed an implant to correct a woman's orbital floor fracture, causing permanent visual impairment. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on January 16, 2018, and it is the 24th medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A woman fell in her home and injured her right eye, but experienced no vision loss at that time. At Holy Cross Hospital a CT scan identified a right orbital blowout fracture with herniation of the right inferior rectus muscle and the intra-orbital fat through the fracture defect. In other words, the muscle and fat controlling eye movement were pushed through the part of her eye socket that had broken in the fall. Her vision and eye movement were still normal, so she was discharged home with instructions to follow up with a reconstructive otolaryngologist/plastic surgeon.

During the follow-up appointment, the doctor determined that the woman would require surgical correction. The fracture in her orbital floor was so large that it would have to be repaired with an implant. The woman underwent surgery two weeks later at Holy Cross Hospital. The doctor sized and cut the orbital implant to cover the fracture, placed the implant, and affixed it with three screws.

Immediately after surgery, the woman was unable to move her right eye, couldn't keep it open, and complained of double vision (diplopia). The doctor evaluated her one week later and said she was healing normally, even though she was still experiencing pain with eye movements, diplopia, and limited range of motion.

After obtaining a second and third opinion, the woman underwent a CT scan, revealing that her orbital floor plate was displaced and trapping the tissue around her eye muscle. To make matters worse, the plate was not adequately covering her orbital floor fracture, allowing her eye muscle and fat to continue herniating through the defect.

One month after the initial procedure, the woman underwent another surgery to repair her orbital floor fracture and remove the implant. Even though the second procedure was successful, the woman still experiences right nose and upper lip numbness, double vision, and up-gaze restriction. She uses corrective lenses, prisms, and scotch tape occlusion, but the severe double vision still impairs her ability to walk and drive safely.

Additional Comments
  • Unfortunately, surgical implant errors such as this are relatively common. When the eye muscle becomes entrapped, a patient's chances of recovery are better the sooner the muscle is released. As such, it is important for doctors to perform forced deduction test during surgery and take CT scans after surgery in order to make sure the implant was placed properly, and reposition the implant quickly if necessary. Because this claimant's eye muscle was entrapped for more than a month, she sustained permanent muscle damage.
  • When a patient experiences eyelid, upper lip, or nose numbness after an eye surgery such as this, it is most often due to infraorbital nerve damage. The maxillary nerves, which run across the front of the face from the lip up to the eyes, is renamed the infraorbital nerve once it reaches the infraorbital canal, or the base of the eye socket. This claimant's right infraorbital nerve was affected during surgery, causing numbness in the extremities of her right maxillary nerve.
  • Plaintiff has a local expert which is often hard to find in medical malpractice cases.
Jurisdiction
  • Montgomery County
Defendants
  • Metropolitan ENT & Facial Plastic Surgery
  • A Rockville otolaryngologist (ENT)
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • Holy Cross Hospital
Negligence
  • Failing to properly place the implant across the entire orbital floor fracture.
  • Failing to identify the incorrectly placed implant during or immediately after surgery.
Specific Counts Pled
  • Medical Negligence: The claimant's vision is permanently impaired as a result of surgical negligence.
  • Informed Consent: The claimant was not educated about the foreseeable risks and complications of the procedure beforehand.
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty
  • Shannath L. Merbs, M.D., Board Certified in Ophthalmology, specializing in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. She is located in Baltimore and is affiliated with Johns Hopkins.
Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you suffered a hospital injury due to the negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you. Call us at (800) 553-8082 and speak to one of our medical malpractice attorneys who can help you or get an online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Medical Malpractice
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA
Contact Us For a Free Consultation

I understand that submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. I also understand that Miller & Zois works with multiple law firms on these claims and that I may be contacted by an affiliated law firm working with Miller & Zois on these lawsuits.