Hematoma Suffocation Lawsuit
Sample v. University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus This wrongful death claim was filed in Baltimore City when a surgeon at UMMC Midtown failed to notice a hematoma blocking a patient's airway after neck surgery. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on January 25, 2018, and it is the 44th medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year.
Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations A man underwent a carotid endarterectomy, a surgical procedure that reduces the risk of stroke by removing blockages from the carotid artery, at the University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus (UMMC Midtown). He was given a short-acting blood thinner (Heparin) and two long-term blood thinners (Aspirin and Warfarin) after the surgery was completed.
Shortly after starting on intravenous Heparin, the man began to show signs of hemorrhaging (bleeding) in his neck, including neck pain, neck swelling, and facial swelling. The man's complaints of neck pain, difficulty breathing, and shortness of breath persisted through the following day.
Eventually, that evening, the man struggled to breathe because the undiagnosed hematoma in his neck was compressing his windpipe. The surgeon was unable to establish an airway, and the man suffocated and died.
Additional Comments - This study shows that neck bleeding is a relatively common complication after a carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The effect of anticoagulant (like Heparin or Warfarin) and antiplatelet (like Aspirin) medications on CEA outcomes is not fully known, but they may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding. When serious hematoma complications do occur, they require emergency surgery.
- The decedent was showing obvious signs of hematoma for approximately 24 hours before he suffocated. Regardless of what caused the hematoma, 24 hours of neck swelling, pain, and difficulty breathing is more than enough evidence for health care providers to suspect and investigate a potential bleed.
- Although the various blood thinners may have contributed to the hemorrhaging, the plaintiffs' attorneys seem to focus their argument on the delayed hematoma diagnosis. It would be difficult to prove that the excess bleeding was caused by surgical negligence, but the medical team certainly should have noticed and treated the bleed much earlier.
Jurisdiction Defendants - A general surgeon and his medical practice
- Maryland General Hospital Inc. d/b/a University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus
- University of Maryland Surgical Associates, P.A.
- University of Maryland Surgical Associates, LLC
- University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated - University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus
Negligence - Failing to timely recognize that a hematoma was obstructing the man's airway.
- Failing to timely detect the man's tracheal deviation.
- Failing to diagnose and treat the man's hematoma.
- Failing to timely intubate the man or otherwise establish an airway.
- Failing to ensure that the man received sufficient oxygen between intubation attempts.
Specific Counts Pled - Wrongful Death: The man died as a result of the defendant health care providers' negligence.
- Survival Action: Before he died, the man suffered pain, severe injuries, mental stress, underwent unnecessary medical interventions, and incurred medical expenses as a result of the defendant health care providers' negligence.
Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim Have you suffered a hospital injury due to the negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you. Call us at (800) 553-8082 and speak to one of our medical malpractice attorneys who can help you or get an online case review.
More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA