UMMC Fall Negligence Lawsuit

Anonymous v. University of Maryland Midtown Health Inc.

This medical malpractice lawsuit was filed by an Ellicott City woman in Baltimore City University of Maryland Midtown Health against after the woman falls and suffers a traumatic brain injury due to a negligent assessment of her fall risk and inadequate fall prevention measures. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on May 8, 2017, and it is the 217th medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A 35-year-old woman was admitted to the defendant hospital with an E. coli infection in her right eye and leg. She underwent a vitrectomy on her eye and surgical debridement on her leg. As a result of the infection and the surgeries, she was blind in her right eye and unsteady due to the pain and weakness in her right leg.

Over the five days that the woman was in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), she required various restraints and her fall risk assessment was elevated to a "critical" fall risk. The woman did, in fact, fall from her bed while she was in the ICU. A subsequent CT scan was negative for any abnormalities. The woman was then transferred from the ICU to a telemetry unit, where her fall risk assessment dropped a startling forty points, inappropriately classifying her as a "standard risk" even though she had fallen just two days previously. This reduction in her score was supposedly due to the hospital personnel's failure to account for her recent fall in the ICU. As such, she was not afforded the necessary fall risk prevention measures.

After one week in the telemetry unit, the woman fell and violently struck her head. Over the next 24-hours the woman was behaving inappropriately, trying to take her gown off, pulling off her catheter dressing, insisting on using the bathroom rather than a bedpan, pulling off her monitor, and crying for unknown reasons. The next evening, the nurses noted that they were unable to wake the woman after she had fallen asleep. At noon the next day, she was still asleep, unarousable. After a CT scan, it was determined that she had an extensive multicompartmental intracranial hemorrhage.

She was transferred to the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center, where a head CT revealed a linear left occipital skull fracture extending into the mastoid prominence, an intracranial hemorrhage, and a left subdural hematoma with mass effect. The woman underwent a craniotomy with evacuation and suffered extensive inpatient stays at multiple rehabilitation centers for traumatic brain injury and physical therapy. She now requires 24-hour care and supervision.

Additional Comments
  • The crux of this case is whether the victim should have been considered a critical fall risk. This issue comes up frequently in nursing home fall case in a very similar way that it comes up in this case.
  • The most notable difference in this case and a nursing home case is the damages. Few nursing homes fall lead to permanent brain injuries that require 24-hour care. Even when they do, the life care plan is very different because the victim here was 35-years-old. She may also have future lost wages for the next 30-35 years.
  • This case was filed in Baltimore City Circuit Court in June 2017.  Waranch & Brown is defending the hospital.  
Jurisdiction
  • Baltimore City
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • University of Maryland Midtown Health Inc.
  • University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center
Negligence
  • Failure to properly assess the woman's fall risk
  • Failure to put the appropriate safety measures in place to prevent falls for a high-risk patient
Specific Counts Pled
  • Economic damages: lost wages, past and future medical expenses
  • Noneconomic damages: physical and emotional pain, fear and anxiety, loss of consortium
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you suffered a hospital injury due to the negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you. Call us at (800) 553-8082 and speak to one of our medical malpractice attorneys who can help you or get an online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA