Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Eye Surgery Malpractice Lawsuit

Wallick v. Johns Hopkins Hospital

(Filed January 4, 2017)

This is an ophthalmologist malpractice case filed in Baltimore City by a man residing in New Jersey. This case was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on January 4, 2017. It is the second medical malpractice case filed in 2017 in Maryland.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

Plaintiff is a 64-year-old male with a history of double vision. He has been diagnosed with divergence insufficiency (meaning his eyes point in the same direction). Plaintiff consults with the defendant doctor to discuss treatment options, and the defendant doctor recommends surgery.

The eye surgery is performed. However, plaintiff alleges that during the procedure, the defendant doctor improperly placed sutures in his left eye that come loose and caused a divot in the sclera (the white part of the eye). Defendant doctor then performs a second procedure to retrieve the sutures, but he again improperly utilizes the wrong tool for the repair. While performing the corrective procedure, he lacerates the plaintiff's sclera with a tool and damages the retina. After failing to repair these issues, he calls for an evaluation by a retina specialist who finds retinal tears with subretinal fluid and hemorrhage.

As a result of this, the plaintiff no longer has vision and is permanently disabled. He faces substantial extraordinary medical and care expenses.

Additional Comments
  • Divergence insufficiency is considered a supranuclear palsy. The supranuclear eye movements are involved in keeping our eyes in proper position. The human visual system has to alternate quickly between convergence and divergence to properly focus on targets of different distances. In patients with divergence insufficiency, the patient cannot focus on objects and have poor depth perception. The problem is distance or near depending on which deficiency they manifest. In divergence insufficiency, the patients will often have difficulty with distance vision or double vision at a distance though not at near. This can be managed with prism in glasses, but without the prism the patient will have double vision.
  • The defendant doctor is an older doctor with a resume as long as your arm. The Wilmer Eye Institute is world renowned and Baltimore jurors know it. Given these facts, the liability case needs to be very strong for the plaintiff to overcome the halo effect of this doctor and this medical facility.
  • Medical malpractice lawsuits against ophthalmologists are not particularly common. This is not because they do not commit malpractice but because they are generally hard to prove.
  • Baltimore City
  • Patient doing an Eye ExamJohns Hopkins Hospital
  • Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation
  • Board certified physician in ophthalmology
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • Johns Hopkins
  • Failure to properly suture plaintiff's eye
  • Failure to appropriately evaluate plaintiff's condition
  • Negligently lacerating sclera and damaging the retina
  • Negligently failing to repair the damage
  • Negligently failing to provide appropriate care
Specific Counts Pled
  • Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you or a loved one suffered and you suspect the negligence of a doctor, nurse or hospital? Miller & Zois can help you get the justice and compensation for the harm you have endured. We have a long history of results in medical malpractice cases in Maryland. Call us today at (800) 553-8082 to speak with a caring attorney or get a free online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA