COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »
Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Breast Implant Malpractice Lawsuit in Salisbury

Gay v. Peninsula Plastic Surgery, P.C.

misdiagnosisThis is a plastic surgery malpractice lawsuit filed without a lawyer by a Delaware woman on the Eastern Shore after she has breast augmentation surgery done and the results are asymmetrical. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on February 16, 2017, and is the 83th medical malpractice lawsuit filed in Maryland in 2017.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

Plaintiff goes to defendant surgeon in Salisbury for breast augmentation surgery. She is admitted to the facility and the surgery is performed. Later that afternoon, the woman notices that her breasts are asymmetrical and uneven. Within a week, she returns to the defendant's facility to ask them to fix the problem.

A little more than a week after the initial procedure, the defendant doctor performs a "push down" procedure to fix the problem. This is done without informed consent and causes one of the breast implants to rupture. Plaintiff alleges that the doctor attempted to manually break some of the internal sutures to align her breasts. The woman later learns that during the surgery, the doctors over-dissected her nipple and attempted to repair it, without informed consent.

Additional Comments
  • You can bet the plaintiff is extremely angry at what happened to her, maybe with good reason. But her chances of successfully bringing this medical malpractice claim without a lawyer is vanishingly low.
  • Many breast augmentation malpractice lawsuits involve a pneumothorax out of the normal dissection plane and enter the pleural cavity causing a pneumothorax occurring during the performance of breast augmentation. This is usually caused by an inexperienced or inattentive surgery who strays out of the normal dissection plane and enters the pleural cavity causing a pneumothorax. It is a known complication but that known complication is often poorly managed.
Jurisdiction
  • Wicomico (probably, the lawsuit does not say)
Defendants
  • Peninsula Plastic Surgery, P.C.
  • A plastic surgeon
Negligence
  • Violating the standard of care
  • Use of a poor technique when performing the "push down" procedure in attempting to fix the problem
  • Performing the "push down" procedure without informed consent
  • Performing over-dissection of the nipple and attempting to repair it without getting informed consent from the patient
  • Applying excessive force and pushing the plaintiff's breast while attempting to fix the problem, rupturing the breast implant
Specific Counts Pled
  • Medical Negligence
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty
  • None at this time
Leading Breast Augmentation Surgery Cases
  • Gluckstein v. Lipsett: One of the first cases involving cosmetic breast surgery. California court upheld a $115,000 verdict, an extremely large amount money in 1949.
  • Sutch v. Yarinsky: New York verdict of $800,000 against a doctor who left scarring and other complications was not excessive.
  • An $85,000 verdict for the wife of the former mayor of San Diego in 2017. 
Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you been injured due to the negligence of a doctor? You are entitled to justice and compensation for the harm done to you. Call Miller & Zois today at (800) 553-8082 to speak with an attorney who can help you and answer your questions. You can also get a free online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA