Close

Ruptured Aortic Aneurysm Lawsuit in Dorchester County

Windsor v. Anonymous Doctors

This is a failure to diagnose a ruptured aortic aneurysm lawsuit filed against two cardiologists in Cambridge. This case was filed on March 20, 2017, in Health Claims Arbitration. It is the 129th medical malpractice lawsuit filed in Maryland in 2017 (and the first one filed in Dorchester County).

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A man goes to defendant doctors with abdominal pain after being a patient of theirs for three years. Defendants are aware that he is known to have an aortic aneurysm. An aneurysm is a permanent and irreversible localized dilatation of a vessel(bulging in the aortic walls). Many aortic aneurysms do not cause symptoms, however, they can either leak or burst if they become too large. The man's abdominal pain is new, and upon exam, defendants find a pulsatile aorta (mass) that was not present on other exams. Defendants order a CT angiogram of the man's aorta and recommend a follow-up in three months.

The CT is performed the following day. It takes another four days to be interpreted. It is at this point that it is discovered the man's aortic aneurysm has enlarged since a study one year ago and that it is consistent with a chronic contained rupture. Defendants advise him to go to Easton Memorial Hospital to be stabilized and then transported to Johns Hopkins to have his aneurysm repaired.

While he is at Easton Memorial Hospital, the man is stable but has increasing abdominal pain. While waiting to be transported, there is a sudden pop. He becomes, as is the classical case with a ruptured aneurysm, hypotensive and pulseless. An emergency exploratory laparotomy is done, and he is transferred to Hopkins where they find a three-centimeter hole in his aorta.

Due to the aorta being completely ruptured and the substantial amount of blood loss, the man's bowel begins to become restricted. He condition continues to deteriorate. He dies within three days from his ruptured aortic aneurysm.

The man's family and their medical malpractice lawyers allege that upon the first presentation of the abdominal pain and the mass that the defendants should have sent him to the emergency room because his symptoms were consistent with a ruptured aortic aneurysm.

Additional Comments
  • The most common symptom of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is abdominal pain or discomfort. The patient has a history of aortic aneurysms. Plaintiff's malpractice lawyers are going to argue that dissection of the patient's aorta and aortic aneurysm should be part of the differential diagnosis from the second that man related his history. Many patients with this man's history are told by their doctors f you've got any severe abdominal pain (or back or flank pain) to the emergency room and tell them you have an aneurysm.
  • Sometimes, careful palpation or feeling of the abdomen can reveal an abnormally wide pulsation. Listening with a stethoscope may unveil an abnormal sound that is caused by the turbulence of blood within the aneurysm. Aneurysms on the verge of rupture, as this man's clearly was, are frequently tender to the touch. Clearly, the cardiologist found at least a mass on the man's stomach.
  • Catching these an aortic aneurysms before they rupture is critical. After an aneurysm ruptures, only approximately 25% of patients reach the hospital alive, and only 10% reach the operating room alive. This man was already in the hospital. But the statistics underscore that time is of the essence.
  • It may be that the best thing the defendant doctors have going for them is this is a Dorchester County venue. This is historically a very conservative county that gives the benefit of the doubt to doctors.
  • Defendants are also going to argue that the risk of rupture is relatively low for aneurysms 5.5 cm or less in diameter.
Jurisdiction
  • Dorchester County
Defendants
  • Two Cambridge, Maryland cardiologists
Hospitals Where Patient Was Treated
  • Easton Memorial Hospital
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
Negligence
  • Failure to properly and adequately treat the patient
  • Failure to timely follow-up on the patient's complaints, signs, and symptoms
  • Failure to send the patient to the emergency room for evaluation of his aortic aneurysm and symptoms
  • Failure to notify the patient's vascular surgeon of the potential need for surgery
Specific Counts Pled
  • Wrongful Death
  • Survival Action
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty
  • Morton R. Rinder, M.D. - licensed in Missouri and Maryland; board-certified in Internal Medicine and Cardiology
Getting a Lawyer for Your Failure to Diagnose Malpractice Claim

If you have suffered an injury due to the negligence of a doctor, our firm can help you. We have a long history of obtaining results in medical malpractice cases in Maryland, earning large verdicts and settlements. Call Miller & Zois today to speak with a medical malpractice attorney who can help you at (800) 553-8082, or get a free online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA
Contact Us For a Free Consultation

I understand that submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. I also understand that Miller & Zois works with multiple law firms on these claims and that I may be contacted by an affiliated law firm working with Miller & Zois on these lawsuits.