COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »
Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Damaged Tendon During Bunionectomy Lawsuit

Long v. The Chesapeake Ambulatory Surgery Center

HalluxThis foot surgery medical malpractice claim was filed in Anne Arundel County after a woman's tendon was negligently cut during an operation to remove a bunion. This lawsuit was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on March 26, 2018, and it is the 141st medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

After undergoing a procedure to remove a bunion (bunionectomy), a woman's foot failed to heal properly. At the time of her postoperative follow-up appointment, she was continuing to experience pain and discomfort. The woman told her podiatrist that she was concerned with the way the bunionectomy was healing. She felt that her toe was overcorrected, causing discomfort and frequent falls.

The podiatrist determined that he had lacerated the woman's flexor tendon during surgery, which caused the joint in her toe to contract. The woman had a corrective surgery performed at Union Memorial Hospital by another surgeon.

Additional Comments
  • The claimant's expert witness, another podiatrist, notes that there was no documentation of conservative care options before the bunionectomy took place. This is significant because doctors should attempt to treat their patients with less dramatic and less invasive forms of care before recommending surgery.
  • Hallux valgus, the medical term for a bunion, is a bony bump on the base joint of the big toe. Bunions develop when the big toe is pushed toward the next toe, causing the joint at the base of the big toe to stick out.
  • When the podiatrist "overcorrected" the woman's bunion, he caused a hallux varus deformity. Opposite to hallux valgus, hallux varus occurs when the big toe to shifts in the other direction, away from the next toe.
  • You might have expected a claim that Plaintiff's malpractice lawyers alleging that the podiatrist deviated from the standard of care for podiatric surgeons not just by lacerating the tendon but for the failure to timely diagnose and secure prompt treatment for the ruptured hallux tendon. A delay in prompt diagnosis and treatment allows the tendon to retract. This and makes a good recover recovery more unlikely.
Jurisdiction
  • Anne Arundel County
Defendants
  • A podiatrist
  • The Chesapeake Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC
  • Foot and Ankle Specialists of the Mid-Atlantic, LLC
Hospitals Where Patient Was Treated
  • Union Memorial Hospital
Negligence
  • Failing to perform an appropriate bunionectomy without damaging the tendon.
Specific Counts Pled
  • As a direct result of the defendants' negligence, the claimant suffered severe, painful, and permanent injuries which caused her to incur medical expenses and loss of income.
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty
  • Philip J. Obiedzinski, DPM, podiatric medicine and foot & ankle surgery
Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you suffered a hospital injury due to the negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you. Call us at (800) 553-8082 and speak to one of our medical malpractice attorneys who can help you or get an online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA