COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »
Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Spinal Cord Stimulator Paralysis Lawsuit

Taylor v. Davis Spine & Orthopedics

Spinal Cord StimulatorThis medical malpractice claim was filed in Anne Arundel County after a woman suffered paralysis and incontinence due to a negligently placed spinal cord stimulator. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on March 19, 2018, and it is the 135th medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A woman presented to an orthopedic surgeon at the Maryland Specialty Surgery Center to undergo a spinal cord stimulator placement procedure. Ninety minutes after the surgery was completed, the woman was discharged home despite complaints of pain.

Two days later, the woman began to feel weakness and numbness from her torso down to her feet. An ambulance transported her to the University of Maryland Medical System Shock Trauma Center, where she was found to have an obstruction near her spinal cord stimulator. The woman was taken to surgery in order to evacuate the collection of blood in her spinal canal which was compressing her spinal cord and nerves. During surgery, her spinal cord stimulator was also removed.

Unfortunately, the corrective surgery was not able to reverse the woman's injury. As a result of the allegedly negligently placed spinal cord stimulator, the woman suffered a permanent neurological injury, resulting in complete lower body paralysis as well as bladder and bowel dysfunction.

Additional Comments
  • Spinal cord stimulation is a technique for treating chronic pain that cannot be relieved through more conservative forms of treatment. A spinal cord stimulator blocks the sensation of pain by continuously delivering a low electrical current to the spinal cord.
  • Patients must meet a variety of criteria in order to qualify for spinal cord stimulator placement. The placement procedure is a surgery like any other, with possible risks and complications. Because surgery is a relatively dramatic treatment option for chronic pain, patients must demonstrate that other more conservative treatments, such as injections or therapy, were not able to relieve their pain for a minimum of six months.
  • This looks like a really tough case for plaintiff even if she had a lawyer.
Jurisdiction
  • Anne Arundel County
Defendants
  • An orthopedic doctor
  • Davis Spine & Orthopaedics
  • Maryland Specialty Surgery Center
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • University of Maryland Medical System
Negligence
  • Recommending and performing an unnecessary procedure.
  • Failing to obtain and assess coagulation studies prior to surgery.
  • Failing to stop the claimant's medications, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, prior to surgery.
  • Failing to appropriately recognize and appreciate the claimants increased risk of bleeding.
  • Failing to utilize proper surgical techniques.
  • Failing to recognize that there was insufficient space in the claimant's spinal canal for a spinal cord stimulator.
  • Failing to properly place, adjust, and program the spinal cord stimulator.
  • Failing to detect, diagnose, and treat intraoperative and/or postoperative bleeding.
  • Failing to timely obtain consultations and perform corrective surgery.
  • Failing to adequately inform the claimant of the risks involved in surgery.
Specific Counts Pled
  • As a direct result of the defendants' negligence, the claimant suffered an irreversible and disabling physical injury.
  • Informed consent
Plaintiff Firm/Attorneys
  • Pro se
Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you suffered a hospital injury due to the negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you. Call us at (800) 553-8082 and speak to one of our medical malpractice attorneys who can help you or get an online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA