COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »
Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Inmate Dental Malpractice Lawsuit

Ivy v. Moubarek

DentistThis dental malpractice claim was filed in Allegany County after a man suffered mouth and jaw pain as a result of a negligent tooth extraction. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on March 19, 2018, and it is the 132nd medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year. After a flurry of dental malpractice cases filed the first two months of 2018, this is the first dental malpractice case in March. It is also the first prison dental malpractice case we can recall in recent years.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A man incarcerated in Cumberland presented to the dental department with complaints of a toothache. The dentist diagnosed the man with an infection and said the tooth would have to be pulled once swelling from the infection went down. In the meantime, the dentist prescribed antibiotics to treat the infection.

Two days later, the man reported back to the dental department. A different dentist made an attempt to pull the affected tooth but broke it in the process. Instead of properly completing the tooth extraction, the dentist stitched up the man's gums with the broken tooth fragment still inside. Immediately after he left the dentist's office, the man began to experience jaw pain and headaches.

Eventually, after one week of pain and disturbed sleep, the man went back to the dentist. X-rays confirmed that broken remnants of the tooth were still embedded in the jawbone and gums. The dentist attempted to remove the remainder of the tooth but gave up after an hour. The next day, the man was transported to a dental surgeon outside the prison for a third attempt at the tooth extraction. The outside dental surgeon was successful, but the man continues to suffer mouth and jaw pain.

Additional Comments
  • Due to the relatively small damages that typically result from an incident of dental malpractice, it can be difficult to find an attorney willing to take on a dental malpractice lawsuit. In this case, the man's injury was largely corrected during the third extraction attempt. Because he has little or no permanent damages, pursuing this lawsuit will likely cost more than the claimant would gain back in a settlement or verdict.
  • The real challenge for an inmate in a medical malpractice case is finding an expert who will testify for you. If you have a lawyer, it is not difficult if you have a viable case. But it is likely difficult for a prisoner with a very viable case to find an expert on his own willing to testify on his behalf at trial that there was a breach of the standard of care and an injury as a result of that breach.
Jurisdiction
  • Allegany County, presumably
Defendants
  • An internal medicine doctor (which is confusing)
Negligence
  • Failing to adequately extract the entire affected tooth.
Specific Counts Pled
  • As a direct result of the defendant's negligence, the claimant suffers mouth and jaw pain.
Plaintiff Firm/Attorneys
  • Pro se (which, in Latin, means on your own behalf - proceeding without a lawyer)
Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you suffered a hospital injury due to the negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you. Call us at (800) 553-8082 and speak to one of our medical malpractice attorneys who can help you or get an online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA