COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »
Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Negligent Tumor Embolization Lawsuit

Gilman v. Johns Hopkins Hospital

MeningiomaThis medical malpractice claim was filed in Baltimore City after a negligent embolization procedure and inappropriate physical therapy caused a man to suffer permanent speech, cognitive, and mobility issues. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on March 22, 2018, and it is the 139th medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A man presented to Johns Hopkins Hospital for an elective embolization procedure to block the blood vessels feeding a tumor in his brain. More specifically, the tumor was a "parafalcine meningioma," meaning that it was growing on the meningioma tissue that covers the brain and spine. Meningioma is a neurological disease that can often cause symptoms by compressing and damaging brain tissue or cranial nerves. In addition to the embolization procedure, the man was also scheduled for a craniotomy to remove the tumor the next day.

When he awoke after the embolization procedure, the man was unable to speak or follow commands and had limited movement in his arms and legs. His doctors believed he suffered a stroke. A CT scan showed hyperdense material in his left frontal lobe and an MRI showed a lack of flow within the cortical branch of the middle cerebral artery. The obstructions in both images were caused by the embolization material - an outcome that should not have occurred with proper embolization technique and monitoring. Five days later, when the man was discharged to acute rehabilitation for therapy, he was able to move his arms and legs but his speech and cognition were still affected.

The surgery to remove the tumor from his brain was postponed for four months. By the time the surgery took place, the man was still having severe difficulties with his speech and cognition, although his physical strength had improved. After the craniotomy, the man had trouble with physical tasks including walking and mobility, so he began physical therapy at Hopkins.

Contrary to the standard of care, the Hopkins physical therapist had the man do leg presses with 70-150 pounds. This amount of weight is excessive for a patient recovering from an open craniotomy. As a result, the man's status continued to decline. He was later transferred to a different rehabilitation facility, but he never fully recovered from the substandard physical therapy. Currently, the man has difficulty with communication and word finding. He cannot walk, hold a proper conversation, or live independently.

Additional Comments
  • While a meningioma can compress the brain and cause neurological issues, it is not technically a brain tumor. Instead of growing within the brain, this particular type of tumor grows on tissue surrounding the brain, pushing up against the brain or spinal cord.
  • Embolization material reflux occurs when the embolic agent (onyx, in this case) flows in the wrong direction, blocking the wrong arteries. This complication can happen as a result of low blood flow, excessive flushing, selective contrast injections, or when the embolic material is placed too close to the center of the body.
Jurisdiction
  • Baltimore City
Defendants
  • Two neurosurgeons
  • A physical therapist
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
Negligence
  • Failing to properly perform an embolization procedure.
  • Failing to prevent embolization material reflux to the left side of the claimant's brain.
  • Failing to properly embolize the left middle cerebral artery.
  • Failing to prevent stroke, extreme aphasia, and cognitive issues.
  • Failing to perform proper physical therapy with appropriate weights.
Specific Counts Pled
  • As a direct result of the defendants' negligence, the claimant suffered disabling injuries, severe aphasia, and cognitive issues. Due to his injuries, the claimant incurred hospital and medical expenses, lost wages, and other financial losses.
  • Loss of Consortium.
Getting a Lawyer for Your Malpractice Claim

Have you suffered a hospital injury due to the negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you. Call us at (800) 553-8082 and speak to one of our medical malpractice attorneys who can help you or get an online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA