COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »
Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Failure to Diagnose Supraventricular Tachycardia

Slavin v. Franklin Square Hospital Center, Inc.

Doctor treating PatientThis failure to diagnose lawsuit was filed on behalf of an infant girl in Baltimore County. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on April 17, 2017, and is the 182nd medical malpractice case filed in Maryland in 2017.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A newborn girl (19 days old) is brought to the ER at Franklin Square Hospital. She is pale, weak, and she has a decreased response to stimuli. Her heart rate is high and she is dusky. She is in clinical shock. He starts her on broad spectrum antibiotic coverage and IV fluids.

Defendant administers 340 cc of IV fluid. Plaintiff alleges this is a considerable amount of fluid to give to an infant, even to combat dehydration. However, the girl is not dehydrated - she is actually suffering fluid overload secondary to congestive heart failure caused by supraventricular tachycardia or SVT (abnormally fast heart rhythm). The girl goes into cardiac arrest, resulting in severe neurological consequences such as permanent brain injury and damage, seizures, and developmental delays.

Her parents file this claim and allege that if defendants had correctly diagnosed their daughter and treated her SVT in a timely manner, she would not have suffered cardiac arrest or the neurological damages caused.

Additional Comments
  • Plaintiff's expert contends that the combination of the excessive fluids she received combined with the delayed diagnosis that resulted in the child's cardiac arrest that caused her injuries.
  • One option the doctors had that plaintiff's expert does not mention is a vagal maneuver. This is applying a bag of ice water or ice over the face including the mouth and the nose. The purpose is to stop the baby from breathing for a time to provoke a powerful vagal response. The vagal nerve goes to the heart and slows down conduction through the atrioventricular node which is part of the cycle that allows supraventricular tachycardia to occur. If conduction there is slowed, it can break the supraventricular tachycardia.
  • Plaintiff's expert argues that the doctors should have given the child either Adenosine or considered a cardioversion. Adenosine is a fairly dangerous drug that can paradoxically cause cardiac arrest. Adenosine treats for supraventricular tachycardia by slowing down the electrical activity of the atrioventricular node. This is the electrical relay between the atrium chambers, the upper chambers of the heart, the ventricle chambers, and the lower chambers of the heart. In supraventricular tachycardia, the electrical impulse passes through the electrical conduction system at the top of the heart. Adenosine breaks the fast loop cycle of supraventricular tachycardia by blocking that impulse from passing. The hope is that this allows the heart's natural pacemaker to regain a sinus rhythm.
Jurisdiction
  • Baltimore County
Defendants
  • A physician and emergency room pediatrician
  • Franklin Square Hospital Center, Inc.
  • Medstar Health, Inc.
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • Franklin Square Hospital
Negligence
  • Failure to make diagnosis of SVT in a timely manner
  • Failure to recognize how abnormal the patient's heart rates were
  • Failing to correctly treat SVT
  • Providing the patient with additional IV fluid, accelerating the patient's deterioration
Specific Counts Pled
  • Medical Negligence
  • Negligence/Medical Malpractice/Respondeat Superior/Agency
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty Getting a Lawyer for Your Failure to Diagnose Malpractice Claim

If you have suffered due to the negligence of a doctor's failure to diagnose your condition, we can help you. Miller & Zois has a history of results in medical malpractice cases, earning large verdicts and settlements. Call Miller & Zois at (800) 553-8082 or get an online case review.

More Malpractice Claim Information
  • Another infant death lawsuit, this one in Charles County in 2016
  • Other cases filed against Franklin Square Hospital this year:
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA