COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »
Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Dialysis Catheter Insertion Wrongful Death Lawsuit

Vaughn v. Dialysis Access Specialists

Patient Getting DialysisThis is a wrongful death lawsuit filed on behalf of a man in Baltimore County after he dies following a catheter insertion. It was filed in Health Claims Arbitration on April 17, 2017 and it is the 181st medical malpractice case filed in Maryland this year.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A 48-year-old man is undergoing dialysis at DaVita Carroll County Dialysis Facility. He goes for his treatment one day but he is sent to Dialysis Access Specialists due to a clotted access point. He needs placement of a tunneled dialysis catheter.

Placing a central catheter is a multi-step process and when step is properly completed one proceeds with the next step. With proper technique a puncture such as this should not occur in the first place. Fluoroscopic evaluation of the guide wire and catheter position should have been done at each step of the procedure to assure adequate placement. In my opinion this was not done and was a breach of the standard of care. Had this been done the errant wire or catheter position would have been detected and corrective action taken.

While inserting the catheter, it coils back on itself. There is a leakage of contrast into the right portal space. The wire and catheter perforated the right subclavian vein.

The man is transported to the ER at St. Joseph Medical Center where resuscitation efforts are unsuccessful. The man dies, and the cause of his death is declared to be a perforation of right subclavian vein during medical procedure. The victim's family files a lawsuit contending that patient's death was a direct result of the mal-positioned tunneled dialysis catheter.

Additional Comments
  • Hundreds of thousands of people in this country suffer from end stage kidney disease requiring some form of dialysis treatment. Dialysis performs removes toxic products from the blood and maintains a normal balance of salts and fluid in the body. These tasks are ordinarily performed by a healthy kidney.
  • In the hemodialysis procedure, blood is rapidly removed from a patient's body for filtration through a dialysis machine. Absent a successful kidney transplant, this time consuming procedure must be performed every 2-3 days for the remainder of a patient's life.
  • To perform hemodialysis, access to circulation is needed via a fistula, graft or catheter. The decedent in this case had thrombus, a clotted fistula or graft, so he needed a temporary catheter.
  • Plaintiff's expert underscores the failure to detect the improper placement. So the complaint is not necessarily getting it wrong as it is failure to recognize and remedy the problem.
  • Presumably, the defendants will argue that puncturing the subclavian artery is a known risk of the procedure.
Jurisdiction
  • Baltimore County
Defendants
  • Mid-Atlantic Nephrology Associates, P.A.
  • Dialysis Access Specialists
  • A nephrologist in Owings Mills
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • St. Joseph Medical Center
Negligence
  • Failure to properly treat patient
  • Failure to perform the appropriate procedure
  • Failure to properly perform a tunneled dialysis access catheter placement
  • Failure to notice improper placement of catheter and wire
  • Failure to document improper placement of guide wire
  • Failure to properly interpret the patient's condition
  • Failure to timely send patient to hospital for immediate care and perform additional measures to treat his medical emergency
Specific Counts Pled
  • Survival Action - Medical Malpractice
  • Wrongful Death
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty Getting a Lawyer for Your Medical Malpractice Claim

Have you been injured due to negligence of a doctor? Miller & Zois can help you get the compensation you deserve. We have a long history of obtaining results in medical malpractice cases. Get an online case review or call us today at (800) 553-8082 to speak to an attorney ready to help you.

More Malpractice Claim Information
Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA