COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »
Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating for Ronald V. Miller Jr.
Best Law Firms
Avvo Rating - 10
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Litigator Awards

Anesthesiologist Propofol Wrongful Death Lawsuit

Cabrera v. Carroll Health Group, LLC

misdiagnosisThis is a wrongful death medical malpractice case filed on behalf of a man against his primary care provider and anesthesiologist, who fail to obtain cardiac clearance prior to sedating him for a colonoscopy. It was filed in Health Claims on April 17, 2017, and it is the 185th medical malpractice case filed in 2017 in Maryland.

Summary of Plaintiff's Allegations

A 56-year-old man has a history of atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, COPD, insulin-dependent diabetes, high blood pressure, sleep apnea, and obesity. He has had multiple cardiac surgeries.

One day, he goes to defendant doctor for a pre-operative clearance for a screening colonoscopy. Defendant doctor clears him for the procedure without an evaluation from a cardiologist. A few days later, the man goes to defendant endoscopy center for the colonoscopy.

He is evaluated by defendant anesthesiologist. Defendant anesthesiologist also does not refer him to a cardiologist but administers sedative anesthetic agents. The levels of carbon dioxide in his respiratory gasses are not measured nor is his blood pressure taken during the procedure. Twice, his heart rate is found to be low. During the procedure, he suffers cardiovascular collapse. The man is taken to Carroll County Hospital where attempts to resuscitate him fail.

The man's wife and children files this wrongful death and survival action lawsuit, alleging that both his primary care provider and the anesthesiologist should have made him get cardiac clearance before beginning the colonoscopy due to his medical history and co-morbidities.

They claim that the acceptable standards of practice and care require defendants to base the decision on which anesthesia to use based on the patient's health history. In this case, they content that the patient history dictated a complete review by a cardiologist.

Presumably, they will proffer an expert who will say that had such an evaluation been done, propofol would not have been the choice. This is because of its depressive effects on the heart. Instead, an anesthetic that does not affect the heart as severely as propofol should have been utilized. Plaintiff may also argue that the procedure should have been scrapped given that it was not urgently needed.

Additional Comments
  • Most of these anesthesia cases allegations that the doctor should have turned off propofol when the patient was exhibiting signs of side effects like hypotension which is a commonly recognized side effect (approximately 25% of cases).
  • The first question in a case like this is whether the screening would have picked up a concern that would have led to a reasonable patient choosing a different path.
  • The doctors may argue that there is no hard evidence that the propofol caused the hypotension. A variety of hemodynamic changes can occur right after initiation of positive pressure ventilation, and propofol is only one potential culprit. This will be a hard argument given the frequency of this side effect.
  • Propofol is the drug that killed Michael Jackson.
Jurisdiction
  • Carroll County
Defendants
  • A primary care provider
  • Carroll Health Group, LLC
  • An anesthesiologist
  • Poole Endoscopy Center, LLC
Hospitals Where Patient was Treated
  • Carroll County Hospital
Negligence
  • Failure to use appropriate treatment, surgery, tests and/or procedures
  • Failure to thoroughly evaluate patient's condition and diagnose him
  • Failure to evaluate effects and results of tests or surgeries performed
  • Failure to provide patient with adequate informed consent
Specific Counts Pled
  • Negligence - Wrongful Death
  • Negligence - Survival Action
  • Agency
Plaintiff's Experts and Areas of Specialty
  • None at this time
Getting a Lawyer for Your Anesthesiologist Malpractice Claim

If you have suffered due to a doctor's negligence, we can help you get the justice and compensation that you deserve. Miller & Zois has a history of obtaining verdicts in medical malpractice cases in Maryland, earning large verdicts and settlements. Call us today at (800) 553-8082 or get an online case review.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
When my sister was killed, we turned to Miller & Zois to fight for us. They stood by us every step of the way and we ended up getting more money than we asked for. C.B. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
My prior lawyer was not able to get the insurance companies to offer a single penny in my case. Then my lawyer referred me to Ron and Laura. It was a long fight and they fought for me every step of the way. My case settled for $1.31 million. A.A. (Baltimore City)
★★★★★
I did not get an offer for my case because the insurance company said they were denying coverage. My lawyer then referred me to Miller & Zois. After Miller & Zois got involved, the offer was raised to $150,000. We thought that was not fair so Miller & Zois took my case to arbitration. Our case was well prepared and perfectly executed. The arbitrator awarded me $405,000. R.V. (Anne Arundel County)
★★★★★
I refer all of my serious injury cases in Maryland to Miller & Zois because they turn over every last stone to maximize the value of their case. The last case I referred to them settled for $1.2 million. John Selinger (New York personal injury lawyer)
★★★★★
As former insurance defense lawyers, Miller & Zois 'know the other side's playbook'. Lawyers Weekly USA